States filed lawsuits towards opioid producers and distributers. Now, about $50 billion in settlement funds have begun to stream to state governments. Advocates need to be sure that it’s used to deal with the dependancy disaster.
ERIC BARADAT/AFP through Getty Photos
conceal caption
toggle caption
ERIC BARADAT/AFP through Getty Photos
States filed lawsuits towards opioid producers and distributers. Now, about $50 billion in settlement funds have begun to stream to state governments. Advocates need to be sure that it’s used to deal with the dependancy disaster.
ERIC BARADAT/AFP through Getty Photos
Early in President Joe Biden’s tenure, his administration promised to play a key function in guaranteeing opioid settlement funds went towards tackling the nation’s dependancy disaster.
Through the 2020 marketing campaign, Biden had laid out a plan to nominate an “opioid disaster accountability coordinator” to help states of their lawsuits towards corporations accused of sparking the overdose epidemic. The next yr, the White Home convened a gathering concerning the soon-to-be finalized settlements, famous that the cash might help drug coverage priorities, and helped create a mannequin legislation that states might undertake in anticipation of receiving funds.
However right this moment, as billions of {dollars} truly begin to stream and state and native leaders make essential selections on find out how to spend the greater than $50 billion windfall to deal with this entrenched public well being disaster, the federal authorities has gone largely quiet.
No federal worker holds the title of opioid disaster accountability coordinator. The Workplace of Nationwide Drug Management Coverage has not launched public statements concerning the settlements in over a yr. And the settlement funds are talked about simply twice in a 150-page nationwide technique to cut back drug trafficking and overdose deaths.
‘Large pots of cash’
The federal authorities is just not legally obligated to interact within the dialogue. In any case, states filed the lawsuits towards corporations that made, bought, or distributed opioid painkillers, together with Johnson & Johnson, McKesson, and Walmart.
However there’s an expectation that the federal authorities, together with the nation’s main businesses on psychological well being and dependancy, ought to play a task. Public coverage and well being consultants say a vacuum of federal management might result in critical wasted alternatives and missteps in using the billions that shall be paid out over almost twenty years — in what might be an unlucky reprise of the multibillion-dollar 1998 settlement with tobacco corporations.
“States get extensive eyes after they get these enormous pots of cash,” says Invoice Pierce, who served as spokesperson for the Division of Well being and Human Providers within the early 2000s. He was there when states started receiving money from the tobacco settlement. Quickly sufficient, cash “begins to seep out to different areas that might be utterly unrelated,” he says.
Again then, tobacco corporations agreed to pay states billions yearly for so long as they continued promoting cigarettes. However there have been no restrictions on the cash’s use and far of it went to plugging state finances gaps, filling potholes, and even subsidizing tobacco farmers. At this time, lower than 3% of the annual payouts help anti-smoking packages.
Defending the opioid money
The opioid settlements have a built-in safety to deal with this concern. Not less than 85% of the cash states obtain have to be spent on opioid-related bills. However interpretations of qualifying bills fluctuate extensively — usually primarily based on state politics. And oversight to date has been weak. The businesses paying out the cash are accountable for holding states to that threshold, however they’re unlikely to watch carefully, authorized consultants say.
Public vigilance might assist, however most states have promised little to no public reporting, making it tough to trace their use of funds. KFF Well being Information is following how state and native governments use — or misuse — the money by this yr.
Some folks hope the federal authorities can fill this hole in oversight.
The Faces of Fentanyl Memorial on the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. It’s a tribute to a few of the individuals who have died within the nation’s ongoing opioid epidemic.
Alex Wong/Getty Photos
conceal caption
toggle caption
Alex Wong/Getty Photos
The Faces of Fentanyl Memorial on the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. It’s a tribute to a few of the individuals who have died within the nation’s ongoing opioid epidemic.
Alex Wong/Getty Photos
“There are alternatives to incentivize” and help state and native governments “in the fitting course,” says Michele Gilbert, a senior coverage analyst with the suppose tank Bipartisan Coverage Middle. The Biden administration can difficulty official steerage, promote the findings of nationwide analysis, or leverage the ability of its purse strings. However to date, “there hasn’t been a whole lot of federal authorities motion on the settlement.”
The Workplace of Nationwide Drug Management Coverage advised KFF Well being Information it repeatedly discusses using settlement {dollars} with governors, mayors, and different elected officers to make sure the cash bolsters federal efforts already underway. Beating the opioid epidemic by disrupting drug trafficking and increasing entry to remedy is without doubt one of the 4 pillars of Biden’s “unity agenda.”
“We all know that increasing entry to remedy for substance use dysfunction, lifesaving interventions like naloxone, and restoration help companies will cut back the harms of dependancy and the overdose epidemic,” mentioned Rahul Gupta, director of nationwide drug management coverage.
That is why the administration helped create a mannequin legislation, as “a blueprint for states and communities on evidence-based methods to make use of opioid settlement funds,” he mentioned. It has been adopted, at the very least partially, by 11 state legislatures and is being thought of by two others.
Classes in lax oversight
However historical past suggests optionally available federal steerage is probably not sufficient to make sure the cash is used for its meant goal.
Matthew Myers, president of the nonprofit Marketing campaign for Tobacco-Free Youngsters, mentioned it was a mistake for the federal authorities to take a again seat on the tobacco grasp settlement greater than twenty years in the past.
These lawsuits aimed, partially, to get well well being care prices for smoking-related diseases. Medicaid, a public insurance coverage program for folks with low incomes or disabilities, was a number one payer. Since Medicaid is collectively funded by the U.S. and state governments, federal authorities had a proper to a few of the settlement cash.
States lobbied Congress to forgo that declare. Myers and different advocates requested legislators to take action provided that they required states to spend at the very least 25% of the funds on anti-smoking efforts.
However Congress waived its proper to the cash unconditionally.
“It was a big missed alternative,” Myers says, “as a result of it meant the federal authorities ended up having no say in any way in how the {dollars} have been used.”
In terms of the opioid settlements, it isn’t clear if the federal authorities will attempt to declare reimbursement for Medicaid bills linked to opioid dependancy, which was estimated at $23 billion in 2019. Bruce Alexander, spokesperson for the Facilities for Medicare & Medicaid Providers, declined to reply particular questions and easily wrote, “CMS is presently reviewing the difficulty.”
The company has tried to recoup prices in at the very least one case.
In 2019, CMS despatched a letter to Oklahoma asking for a part of the state’s $270 million settlement with Purdue Pharma, maker of OxyContin. In response to Phil Bacharach, spokesperson for the Oklahoma legal professional normal’s workplace, the state finally reached an settlement to maintain all its Purdue settlement however later pay $390,000 to the federal company from a separate settlement with opioid producer Endo.
Some states, like Arkansas and Oregon, have deliberate for related potentialities of their public paperwork concerning the opioid settlements. However as of mid-March, neither state had obtained federal requests for his or her share.
A carrot-and-stick method
Well being coverage consultants counsel the Biden administration might use the opportunity of claiming these funds as leverage: In return for permitting states to maintain the money, it might require all of it’s spent on addressing the opioid disaster or be used just for remedies backed by analysis.
Alternatively, it might connect circumstances to the greater than $6 billion in federal grants that goes to states every year to deal with dependancy.
“The federal authorities is spending some huge cash on opioids,” says Pierce, the previous HHS spokesperson. “If they need, they might attempt to tie that cash to necessities that settlement cash be spent on opioids.”
Within the Seventies, the Nixon administration used the same tactic, with federal transportation funding because the carrot. Given the power disaster on the time, the administration needed states to cut back oil consumption by imposing a most velocity restrict of 55 mph. Nevertheless it could not mandate states to take action. As a substitute, Nixon signed a legislation saying states might obtain federal freeway funding provided that they lowered velocity limits. In the long run, all states complied.
Myers, of the Marketing campaign for Tobacco-Free Youngsters, put it this manner: “States will solely take heed to the federal authorities if there is a monetary motive to take action.”
The federal authorities can also counsel the settlements be used to reinforce, not duplicate, current federal funding, mentioned Gilbert, of the Bipartisan Coverage Middle.
As an illustration, the cash might help grassroots organizations that do not have the time or skill to use for federal grants, she mentioned. Or it might go to teams that present sterile syringes and different provides to folks utilizing medicine, which might’t be bought with taxpayer {dollars}.
The federal authorities can emphasize the extra versatile choices for spending the settlement cash in contrast with federal funds, Gilbert mentioned.
The Biden administration has been the primary to embrace grassroots packages and has referred to as for sustainable funding for “hurt discount companies” in its nationwide overdose prevention technique. Nevertheless it has stopped in need of explicitly recommending settlement funds for this goal.
Such initiatives are designed to reduce the dangers of utilizing medicine however are politically fraught, with critics saying they encourage criminal activity and supporters saying they save lives. Native opposition usually takes the type of “not-in-my-backyard” or questions on why sure neighborhoods bear the brunt of dependancy and homelessness considerations.
In such turf disputes, the shortage of federal management is acutely felt, say some advocates.
For instance, in New York, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul rejected a advice to make use of opioid settlement funds to help two overdose prevention facilities — locations the place folks can use illicit medicine below supervision. She cited “numerous state and federal legal guidelines” that make such websites unlawful. A related dialog is happening in San Francisco, with the mayor citing an absence of federal authorized readability on the difficulty.
Federal authorities have not acted to close down any websites to date however have not publicly supported them both. The Workplace of Nationwide Drug Management Coverage declined to remark, given ongoing litigation in a associated case in Philadelphia.
Some folks query whether or not the Biden administration’s weighing in would have a lot affect, given the deep political divisions in some states the place native officers are desirous to flout federal steerage. Earlier this yr, Republican leaders in Tennessee rejected thousands and thousands of {dollars} in federal funding for HIV prevention to push again on federal help for transgender and abortion rights.
However Regina LaBelle, who was performing director of nationwide drug management coverage throughout Biden’s early years and now works for Georgetown College’s O’Neill Institute, says the federal authorities has managed to information state coverage on controversial subjects earlier than.
In 2015, shortly after intravenous drug use sparked a significant HIV outbreak in Scott County, Indiana, the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention revealed a research displaying different counties have been equally weak. Kentucky, recognized as a scorching spot, went on to implement insurance policies that dramatically elevated the variety of syringe service packages, that are identified to cut back HIV transmission.
At this time, the Biden administration might present information to equally inform native selections, LaBelle says. A nationwide dashboard launched late final yr to point out nonfatal overdoses is a begin. And there’s time to construct on that, for the reason that opioid settlements shall be stretched out over a few years, she added.
“We’ve a possibility to see what’s the suitable function of the federal authorities,” LaBelle says. “It isn’t too late.”
KFF Well being Information, previously generally known as Kaiser Well being Information (KHN), is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points and is without doubt one of the core working packages at KFF — the impartial supply for well being coverage analysis, polling, and journalism.